To: | towertalk reflector <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Limitation on tower width. Was: RevocationofBuildingPermit? |
From: | Alan AB2OS <ab2os@att.net> |
Date: | Sat, 17 Jul 2004 16:14:42 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
But the bottom section is still as much as 32" dia. (too much for the
OP). And how many cars could I buy for the price of one of those? Alan AB2OS On 07/17/04 02:17 pm Gene Smar put fingers to keyboard and launched the following message into cyberspace: Here's another model of self-supporting tower: http://www.arraysolutions.com/Products/bigbertha.htm . _______________________________________________Cupertino has a 12 inch width limitation, which is just enough for Rohn 25. Basically, that limits you to guyed towers or self supporting pipe towers. A 55 foot Sky Needle would be perfectly legal. In many cases, a Sky Needle is an excellent solution for city lots, but it seems to be an overlooked option, judging by the amount of discussion about zoning issues. See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | RE: [TowerTalk] Limitation on tower width. Was: Revocation ofBuildingPermit?, Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK) |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [TowerTalk] Limitation on tower width. Was:RevocationofBuildingPermit?, Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK) |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Limitation on tower width. Was: RevocationofBuildingPermit?, Gene Smar |
Next by Thread: | RE: [TowerTalk] Limitation on tower width. Was:RevocationofBuildingPermit?, Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |