Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Using 4 - 6 elevated radials in lieu of 120 buried wires

To: "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com>, Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Using 4 - 6 elevated radials in lieu of 120 buried wires
From: Wes Stewart via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Wes Stewart <n7ws@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 15:38:00 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
 Not me.  My radials are all on the ground and they are all appropriately 
shortened.

    On Friday, January 5, 2024 at 08:05:47 AM MST, Jeff Blaine 
<keepwalking188@ac0c.com> wrote:  
 
 There is another practical issue here.  I would agree that elevated 
radials can work great.  But in practice, MAINTENANCE of the elevated 
radials is a non-ending headache.  Around here we have deer and ice and 
wind and on and on.  I ran various 40m 4SQ elevated radial schemes for 
years and eventually went to an in-ground installation because I was 
tired of the hassle.

You are probably a far better mechanical and electrical hand than I am.  
But this maintenance aspect of elevated radials is something I don't 
think gets enough mention.

73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com

On 1/5/2024 8:42 AM, Wes Stewart via Topband wrote:
> I was about to recommend Rudy's work.  He is a prolific experimenter and 
> writer; reading his stuff will answer almost anything you ever what to know 
> about vertical antennas, ground systems and receiving antennas.
> I have a folder on my hard drive with 30-40 of his papers.
>
>
>
>    On Friday, January 5, 2024 at 01:03:55 AM MST, Jim Brown 
><jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
>
>
> Some thoughts about that particular installation and why it worked well,
> based on my study of Rudy Severns' excellent work on the topic.

  
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>