Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Using 4 - 6 elevated radials in lieu of 120 buried wires

To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Using 4 - 6 elevated radials in lieu of 120 buried wires
From: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 08:58:52 -0600
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
There is another practical issue here.  I would agree that elevated radials can work great.  But in practice, MAINTENANCE of the elevated radials is a non-ending headache.  Around here we have deer and ice and wind and on and on.  I ran various 40m 4SQ elevated radial schemes for years and eventually went to an in-ground installation because I was tired of the hassle.

You are probably a far better mechanical and electrical hand than I am.  But this maintenance aspect of elevated radials is something I don't think gets enough mention.

73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com

On 1/5/2024 8:42 AM, Wes Stewart via Topband wrote:
I was about to recommend Rudy's work.  He is a prolific experimenter and 
writer; reading his stuff will answer almost anything you ever what to know about 
vertical antennas, ground systems and receiving antennas.
I have a folder on my hard drive with 30-40 of his papers.



   On Friday, January 5, 2024 at 01:03:55 AM MST, Jim Brown 
<jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:


Some thoughts about that particular installation and why it worked well,
based on my study of Rudy Severns' excellent work on the topic.
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>