To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40’ x 143’, four 100’ radials, #14 wire. |
From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
Date: | Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:24:13 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On 12/11/2020 2:02 AM, Artek Manuals wrote: However I have always wondered about elevated radials . The NEC ( both 2 and 4) models (not that those are to always be trusted) show very little (if any) improvement beyond four elevated radials, you have any theories on why that is? Intuitively (also not to be trusted) that is a lot of real estate in the spaces between I refer you to N6LF's definitive work. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector |
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 160 L and radials, Richard (Rick) Karlquist |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40, Jim Brown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: I need help proofing an Inverted L model I made please. 40’ x 143’, four 100’ radials, #14 wire., Grant Saviers |
Next by Thread: | Topband: Wednesday activity night, Mark Lunday |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |