george,
i believe that those stations who have key clicks are truly not aware of their
problems.
a private email to the offending station may cure the problem. i really cant
conceive that someone would do this on purpose, especially on top band.
larry n7dd
-----Original Message-----
From: GEORGE WALLNER <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net>
To: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Cc: Jon Zaimes via Topband <topband@contesting.com>; Jon Zaimes
<jz73@verizon.net>
Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2020 2:30 am
Subject: Re: Topband: ARRL 160M and 1830-1835 change
Tim,
You are right. In theory the window could work. But the problem is that
those (non-DX) who violate the rules suffer no consequences. Therefore,
those with the cheek gain an advantage.
But,..
A much (much) bigger problem is stations with strong clicks. I believe that
some may be intentional. If you have strong clicks you will have fewer
stations near "your" frequency. The result is a quieter frequency and a
higher QSO rate! (While the rest of us get squeezed even more.)
In any case, clicks, whether intentional or just the result of either
negligence or a poorly set up station, should not give the source station an
advantage!
73,
George,
C6AGU
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:42:02 -0400
Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com> wrote:
> George, in ARRL 160 the DX would *only* be looking for W/VE if CQing during
> the contest. So the DX Window concept has some value (if anyone ever
> respected it which they didn’t).
>
> This is a fundamental difference from CQ160 where DX can work DX for points.
>
> Arguably DX-only-works-W/VE makes ARRL 160 less popular with some segments of
> DX hams. It’s certainly a fundamental part of the ARRL 160 DNA.
>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 9:31 PM, GEORGE WALLNER <aa7jv@atlanticbb.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> If 1,830 - 1,835 is reserved for "intercontinental contacts", who will
>> should CQ? The DX? He is not a DX on his own continent. These "DX windows"
>> are not practical.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> George
>>
>> C6AGU/AA7JV
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:43:52 +0000 (UTC)
>>
>> Jon Zaimes via Topband <topband@contesting.com> wrote:
>>
>> Interesting Tim.
>>
>> November QST came in a few days ago, and the summary of rules in there says
>> "1.830-1.835 MHz should be used for intercontinental contacts only."
>>
>> Dropping that rule was long overdue so glad to see it stated in the rules
>> online.
>>
>> 73/Jon AA1K
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> From: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
>>
>> To: topBand List <topband@contesting.com>
>>
>> Sent: Thu, Oct 22, 2020 9:35 am
>>
>> Subject: Topband: ARRL 160M and 1830-1835 change
>>
>>
>> Also as I review this years ARRL 160M rules...
>>
>>
>> An earlier version of the rules (current in 2012) here
>>
>> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Contest%20Rules%20PDFs/2012/2012-160M-Rules-V2.pdf
>>
>> says "6.1 The segment 1.830 to 1.835 should be used for intercontinental
>>
>> QSOs only".
>>
>>
>> The latest version here
>>
>> https://contests.arrl.org/ContestRules/160M-Rules.pdf notes that "6. the
>>
>> 1830-135 kHz window is no longer reserved for W/VE-to-DX QSOs in this
>>
>> contest".
>>
>>
>> Does anyone recall, when the rule was officially changed? It wasn't being
>>
>> well respected in some previous years if it was in effect.
>>
>>
>> Tim N3QE
>>
>> _________________
>>
>> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
>>
>> _________________
>>
>> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
>>
>>
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|