Correction.... should have read "non-lawyer".
- Larry K5RK
-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Larry
Burke
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 8:23 AM
To: 'Louis Parascondola'; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation
The RHR lawyers consider a product review in QST by a non-ham as their legal
review? How interesting.
You said you can get the "ruling" that the RHR guys go by. The QST product
review is it?!?
- Larry K5RK
From: Louis Parascondola [mailto:gudguyham@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 8:10 AM
To: wi5a@sbcglobal.net; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation
Larry, I posted it all an hour ago.
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Burke <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
To: topband <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Fri, Jan 15, 2016 9:03 am
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation
> RHR has lawyers on retainer and I'm sure this has been legally looked at.
I can get the ruling they go by.
We'll be waiting with bated breath, Lou Parascondola.
- Larry K5RK
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|