To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: strange propagation |
From: | "Larry Burke" <wi5a@sbcglobal.net> |
Date: | Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:39:52 -0600 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
> Please sign your emails with your callsign (assuming you have one) He's looking at YOU, Lou ("Conversion King") Parascondola. > so I am getting this issue looked at by the owner to see what he says and > I will check on this with the RHR group You seem pretty tight with these guys. What is your affiliation? > Furthermore, the ARRL has looked into the legality and published in QST http://www.remotehamradio.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/RHR-ARRL-REVIEW.pdf I specifically asked someone at the League whether they have examined commercial remote operation from a legal standpoint and was told "no". A product review by a non-lawyer hardly counts as a legal review. If the League has performed such a review, perhaps they would be willing to share it with us. Likewise for the RHR guys. It will never happen. > We have to see if RHR is a registered trademark Yes, RHR is a registered trademark. And the trademark is not held by remotehamradio.com. > I joined this reflector not quite a week ago. I am new to 160 meters Looks like we found the expert. - Larry K5RK _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: strange propagation, Dave Heil |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: strange propagation, Tom W8JI |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: strange propagation, Louis Parascondola via Topband |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: strange propagation, Louis Parascondola via Topband |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |