To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: strange propagation |
From: | Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net> |
Date: | Fri, 15 Jan 2016 14:49:32 -0400 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
RaoulWell liberally quoting Forest Gump....TB Dxing is like a box of chocolates....you never know what your gonna git." I called S9SS for two years before I worked him and that is a chip shot across the pond. The same with DU/N0NM who I never worked but heard daily. Now I am working DU7ET on TB nearly every morning including SSB QSO's. Robert is using a low dipole and we get a good SR/SS enhancement. DU/N0NM was receiving on a vertical which pretty much explains everything. last week FR4NT was peaking at his SR at 579 but couldn't hear me. the next day he laid a bog my direction and it was easy. This thrill of victory and agony of defeat far surpasses and internet QSO. We may soon see Dx-peditions that merely use Skype of a small SDR rig on the shelf to work them on all bands for cash. The tempting for a pay to play operation will trump everything. (No pun intended.) Herb Schoenbohm On 1/15/2016 2:27 PM, Raoul Coetzee via Topband wrote: Herb, I am with you on this one.I know my 160m dxcc will ,one day, go to trash. Thats ok.At least I worked for it, you know, it took me a long time to get your call in the qrn, and I was a green horn! from a small lotwith a great ambition.Now that is more valuable to me than anything else.73Raoul Zs1C, ex ZS1RECFrom: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com> To: topband@contesting.com Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 5:25 PM Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagationThis issue is ripe for discussion now. I should not be relegated to anout of sight out of mind position. It bothers many and is OK with some. It speaks to the soul of amateur radio and everything it stands for. If we don't deal with it know maybe in a few years that ham shacks will only consist of computers. No radios, no antennas, nada. Be very careful what you wish for. And please don't use the "emerging technology" argument because it is specious. Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ On 1/15/2016 11:04 AM, Jim Garland wrote:Guys, seems to me this topic has been worked to death. Maybe it's time to give it a rest. Jim W8ZR _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband_________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband_________________Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 150 MESSAGES, Tree |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: strange propagation, John Frazier |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: strange propagation, Raoul Coetzee via Topband |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: strange propagation, Louis Parascondola via Topband |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |