To: | 4cx250b@miamioh.edu, topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: strange propagation |
From: | Louis Parascondola via Topband <topband@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | Louis Parascondola <gudguyham@aol.com> |
Date: | Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:45:14 -0500 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
You are right Jim. Why can't they accept that the FCC is OK with RHR and leave it at that ? Didn't they read what Tom graciously wrote to explain the whole thing? Done deal. Sent from AOL Mobile Mail -----Original Message----- From: Jim Garland <4cx250b@miamioh.edu> To: topband <topband@contesting.com> Sent: Fri, Jan 15, 2016 10:07 AM Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation Guys, seems to me this topic has been worked to death. Maybe it's time to give it a rest. Jim W8ZR _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - <a href="http://www.contesting.com/_topband" target="_blank">http://www.contesting.com/_topband</a> _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: K5P signal strength, Milt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: Pre-remote operation announcment, Tree |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: strange propagation, Herbert Schoenbohm |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: strange propagation, Larry Burke |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |