An SDR is better for several things, yes. One advantage is that
near-perfect extremely narrow filters can (and do) exist in software. But
as a recent thread here* established, there is *NO* SDR that can perform as
well as a good ear-brain combo for copying the very weakest of signals
buried in the noise. Maybe someday, but the future has not arrived yet. :-)
*I posted a question here and the Linrad reflector on August 4, and
received many informative replies. Many can be viewed at
lists.contesting.com/_topband/2015-08/msg00008.html
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 4:15 PM, JC <n4is@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> It's well know the ability to copy weak signal near strong carriers.
> ...Yes the SDR is a better receiver but...
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|