Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Which is best for copying the weakest DX - DSP or the ear-brain

To: linrad@googlegroups.com, topband <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: Which is best for copying the weakest DX - DSP or the ear-brain combo?
From: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:39:25 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I'd like to know whether it's ever been established that some very talented
hams can out-hear the best SDRs and/or DSP available. Can a skilled
ear-brain combo (such as some highly-skilled and talented 160 meter
contesters) beat state-of-the art digital signal processing when it comes
to copying the very weakest of signals buried in the noise?

I always thought Linrad was the best DSP software, though I never got it
working right here (older sound card issues in Xubuntu).

I asked the following question at
http://www.eham.net/ehamforum/smf/index.php?topic=104388.msg861047#msg861047
: "Are there any people who can hear weak signals with a good analog
receiver, who --if they could instantly switch their antenna and headphones
from the analog RX over to the best SDR made today-- simply couldn't hear
any better with today's best SDRs and/or DSP software?"

There's been a few opinions, but how about multiple valid tests?

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>