Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: K1N DQRM Tracking Project

To: Jim Garland <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>, Topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: K1N DQRM Tracking Project
From: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 23:14:52 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
If you did locate the offender what would you do?

You could report him (or her) to the FCC but the FCC would probably not act 
until they could catch the offender in the act.

These DQRM offenders act sporadically so it would be difficult to track them 
down.

What is the offense? This is not interference in an emergency or health and 
welfare situation but to a station participating in a hobby event which itself 
is using up tens of kilohertz of spectrum for the act of working a "new 
country".

Mike N2MS


----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Garland <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>
To: n0tt1@juno.com, Topband@contesting.com
Sent: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 19:49:28 -0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Topband: K1N DQRM Tracking Project

I don't remember the article, Charlie, but that's a fabulous idea, and at
first blush it doesn't sound all that hard to implement. One way might be to
set up three receivers at different locations, each with a 10 MHz GPS or
rubidium time base (both inexpensive and readily available.). For each
receiver, a simple frequency divider could produce a pulse every 100
milliseconds from the time base. The pulse would trigger a frequency
counter, which would then count the elapsed time from the ttrigger pulse
until the DQRM signal started transmitting (or stopped transmitting -
doesn't matter which).  Once the differences in elapsed times were known
between the three receivers, the DQRM signal could be accurately
triangulated. Sounds ike a fun project. Sure wish we'd had something like
that for the Navassa DQRM jerks.
73,
Jim W8ZR

>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>