| To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions?? |
| From: | "Richard Fry" <rfry@adams.net> |
| Reply-to: | Richard Fry <rfry@adams.net> |
| Date: | Sat, 28 Sep 2013 05:33:09 -0500 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
??? ______________Note that for 1 kW of applied power, the maximum inverse distance field 1 mile from a 5/8-wave vertical is 275 mV/m compared to 195 mV/m from a 1/4-wave vertical. The difference is 20log(275/195) = 2.99 dB, which supports the point of my post. RF _________________ Topband Reflector |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions??, m.r. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions??, Niko Cimbur |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions??, Charlie Cunningham |
| Next by Thread: | Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions??, Niko Cimbur |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |