Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions??

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions??
From: "Richard Fry" <rfry@adams.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:26:43 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Niko AC6DD wrote:
... the 5/8 Vertical idea came from the "All About Vertical Antennas" Book. Getting 3dB with some wire and a balloon sounded pretty good.
____________

The approximate 3 dB improvement of the radiated field of a 5/8-wave monopole compared to a 1/4-wave monopole refer only to the maximum fields they radiate, NOT to the fields they radiate at __all__ elevation angles.

Those maximum fields always occur in the horizontal plane, regardless of the vertical monopole radiator length/height, and/or the conductivity of the earth within a 1/2-wavelength radius from the base of that monopole.

This may be confirmed by referring back to the FCC document linked earlier in this thread ( http://s20.postimg.org/olcquv94d/Monopole_Elev_Patterns.gif ).

For 1 kW of applied power, the groundwave field radiated by a perfect 1/4-wave radiator over a perfect ground plane is about 195 mV/m. For those conditions using a 5/8-wave radiator, the field at 1 mile is about 275 mV/m.

Other things equal, this field improvement in the horizontal plane for a 5/8-wave vertical monopole relative to a 1/4-wave vertical monopole is very close to 3 dB.

RF
_________________
Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>