Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions??

To: "topband@contesting.com" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions??
From: Niko Cimbur <ac6dd@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Niko Cimbur <ac6dd@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
??????
-----Original Message-----

From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Richard
Fry
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 7:27 PM
To: topband at contesting.com Subject: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo 
betta than shorter
versions?? Niko AC6DD wrote:
>... the 5/8 Vertical idea came from the "All About Vertical Antennas" Book.  
>>Getting 3dB with some wire and a balloon sounded pretty good. ____________ 
>The approximate 3 dB improvement of the radiated field of a 5/8-wave 
monopole compared to a 1/4-wave monopole refer only to the maximum fields 
they radiate, NOT to the fields they radiate at  __all__  elevation angles. 
Those maximum fields always occur in the horizontal plane, regardless of the 
vertical monopole radiator length/height, and/or the conductivity of the 
earth within a 1/2-wavelength radius from the base of that monopole. This may 
be confirmed by referring back to the FCC document linked earlier 
in this thread ( http://s20.postimg.org/olcquv94d/Monopole_Elev_Patterns.gif ). 
For 1 kW of applied power, the groundwave field radiated by a perfect 
1/4-wave radiator over a perfect ground plane is about 195 mV/m.  For those 
conditions using a 5/8-wave radiator, the field at 1 mile is about 275 mV/m. 
Other things equal, this field improvement in the horizontal plane for a 
5/8-wave vertical monopole relative to a 1/4-wave vertical monopole is very 
close to 3 dB. RF 
_________________
Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>