Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Filters and grounding

To: <raoulc@smmcape.co.za>, "'K9AY'" <k9ay@k9ay.com>,<topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Filters and grounding
From: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:32:04 -0500
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Raoul,

Gary alluded to BC work. In well-designed BC station studios the audio lines are all balanced shielded lines. The normal procedure, and the proper procedure, is to ground the shield at one end only. This ground normally is at the input end of the equipment since that is the most sensitive spot for RF ingress.

Large RF and AC differentials between equipment or rooms is prevented by using a wide copper flashing that bonds equipment cases together. In a BC environment with proper balanced line installations the bonding of case does, as Gary suggested, help the situation. But this is because the cable shield is intentionally open at one end.

Actually any balanced line filter in a line with no, poor, or open ended shield integrity, say for example a power line filter with no shield or an audio cable shield that is open at one end, needs a bonding ground or a ground path.

Unbalanced lines operating above the frequency where the shield is several skin depths thick, like normal shielded cables in amateur gear, are another case entirely.

I am just wondering here: The outer of the coax and the connectors all have
a finite resistance. In the presence of a very strong field, the impedance
reduction brought about by another path to ground should reduce the voltage
on the cable?

Any voltage drop stays outside the cable. That's how a shield several skin depths thick works. That's why the shielded cables that run for miles in CATV systems are tight as a drum unless the shield breaks or opens at one point. That's why a "shielded" loop, when you short the gap, goes dead. The gap is the point of ingress. Effectively nothing goes through the shield wall anywhere else.


Is this not the reason why we sometimes bury our coax cables
in addition to ferrite chokes and other common mode noise reducing
techniques?

No. I bury my cables to keep them out of harm's way. I can suspend them 10 feet in the air or one foot under ground and the performance of the shield stays the same. They will be virtually stone dead unless the shield is actually broken or has a high resistance at some narrow point.


I might bury them near an antenna or decople them to prevent unwanted currents from following the OUTSIDE of the shield to the antenna, which then can pick up the signal radiated from the outside of the shield, but you better not have the antenna in the house!!


If the coax shield and connectors were perfect then it would not
have been needed?

If they are normal cables and not broken, a ground makes no difference. The exception is lightning or out near the antenna, which is always a point of RF ingress or it would not be called an antenna.


>I am not arguing any point here, just seems to me as if
you both are right, if you have a poor contact/connector somewhere: fix it.
If it is all ok within limits, maybe additional precautions like additional
grounding is needed?

Not in any system I have ever seen. The only thing grounding the outside of the cable does at 1.8 MHz is change the common mode impedance of the cable. This includes grounding the case of an unbalanced filter. If you find the filter case needs to be grounded to improve reception you really need to find out what is bad in the system. Something is probably wrong because that certainly isn't normal, and the last place you want the coaxial lines to be acting like antennas is in the house where all the noise is.


Certain balanced lines are an exception, as are lines operated below the frequency where skin effect isolates the inner and outer walls of the shield. We are, of course, talking 160 meters and higher frequencies so the shield has very good isolation between the inside and outside. Nothing can pass through those walls that are many skin depths thick. It's basic field behavior.

73 Tom

_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>