| To: | Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Inverted "L" Radiation Resistance vs vertical height |
| From: | Joe Craig <jcraig@mun.ca> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:19:29 -0230 (NDT) |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Tom Rauch wrote: > Hi Joe, > > The difference in signal would be larger for a poor ground, Thanks Tom, I should have proofread before posting. So if you're on a small lot, every bit of height helps. Incidently, our own Frank Davis VO1HP recently earned his DXCC on 160 -- from an urban lot that was small in terms of wavelength. 73 Joe _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: RG6 Coax, Carsten Esch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: XW8KPL/RU3DX, UA6LV |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Inverted "L" Radiation Resistance vs vertical height, Tom Rauch |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Inverted "L" Radiation Resistance vs vertical height, armin.ficza |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |