| To: | Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Inverted "L" Radiation Resistance vs vertical height | 
| From: | Joe Craig <jcraig@mun.ca> | 
| Date: | Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:19:29 -0230 (NDT) | 
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> | 
| On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Tom Rauch wrote: > Hi Joe, > > The difference in signal would be larger for a poor ground, Thanks Tom, I should have proofread before posting. So if you're on a small lot, every bit of height helps. Incidently, our own Frank Davis VO1HP recently earned his DXCC on 160 -- from an urban lot that was small in terms of wavelength. 73 Joe _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: RG6 Coax, Carsten Esch | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: XW8KPL/RU3DX, UA6LV | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Inverted "L" Radiation Resistance vs vertical height, Tom Rauch | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Inverted "L" Radiation Resistance vs vertical height, armin.ficza | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |