| To: | <k3hx@juno.com>, <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: Inverted "L" Radiation Resistance vs vertical height |
| From: | <armin.ficza@nokia.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:25:30 +1200 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
I don't have such a table, but have found some material on Cebik's site: http://www.cebik.com/gp/gp2.html I think you can use it. 73, Armin, ZL1KMN _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Linear loaded vertical H, Roy Morgan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: Vertical resonance/bandwidth changed, Harry Williams |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Inverted "L" Radiation Resistance vs vertical height, Joe Craig |
| Next by Thread: | Topband: On Using RG-6 Coaxial Cable..., Ed Swynar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |