To: | "Joe Craig" <jcraig@mun.ca>, <k3hx@juno.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Inverted "L" Radiation Resistance vs vertical height |
From: | "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com> |
Date: | Thu, 14 Sep 2006 06:03:53 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
> Rrad goes by the square of height for 'short' verticals so > you would > see roughly a 40% increase by going to 60'. The > difference in your > signal would also depend on your ground loss and this > would be smaller > for a poor ground. Hi Joe, The difference in signal would be larger for a poor ground, less for a good ground. If the ground was perfectand conductor resistances zero radiation resistance would be unimportant. If the system is very lossy FS is proportional to radiation resistance if determined by a standard method. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: RG6 Coax, Dennis W0JX |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: RG-6 Coaxial Cable..., Tom Rauch |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Inverted "L" Radiation Resistance vs vertical height, Joe Craig |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Inverted "L" Radiation Resistance vs vertical height, Joe Craig |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |