----- Original Message -----
From: <Telegrapher9@aol.com>
To: <richard@karlquist.com>; <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: vert & beverages
> Richard,
>
> You have a good point. I was thinking that one of the small cables (RG178
or
> RG179, note that these are not double shielded) would do the job and not
be
> so heavy and cumbersome. The advantage, I think, is to avoid having to lay
> the coax over rough terrain. This is just a paper design and has not been
> built. I thought I would throw it out to stimulate some thought. No doubt
it
> has been tried before. This could also be implemented using 300 ohm twin
lead
> instead of coax. W8JI would be a good one to review the design.
>
> Dave WX7G
>
I would watch out for the losses in the feedline. RG-174 has almost 2db per
100 feet at a 1:1 SWR. Much too high. This is why using a pair of wires or
open wire line is a better choice.
John K9DX
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> ---
> _______________________________________________
> Topband mailing list
> Topband@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
>
|