To: | Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Omni Vi+ 1.8 kHz filter response (2nd IF @ 6.3 MHz) |
From: | Phil Erickson <phil.erickson@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:51:32 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hi all, The filter checked out OK using the noise technique, and things were better with my test methodology after a bit of a BFO alignment as well. Still, there is no doubt these rigs are not aging particular gracefully as others have pointed out here. 73 Phil W1PJE On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 10:59 PM Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com> wrote: > The disc capacitor values are probably unique for that filter. If someone > has one out of a radio you could compare values. > _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] 160 meter TenTec 240 info wanted, Peter Bertini |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Omni VI+ ALC proper behavior, Phil Erickson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni Vi+ 1.8 kHz filter response (2nd IF @ 6.3 MHz), Peter Bertini |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Omni V PLL Board, Dry Martini Holding Company😎 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |