To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Omni Vi+ 1.8 kHz filter response (2nd IF @ 6.3 MHz) |
From: | Phil Erickson <phil.erickson@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sat, 5 Jan 2019 16:37:23 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hi all, Got it. Barry's link is comprehensive. I will try the noise technique. I have access to a calibrated VNA that I can use for S21 type measurements as well to compare with the simpler noise measurement. I have the feeling that perhaps the crystals have aged in this filter to the extent that it might not be doing its job, but will need to prove it first. Thanks! 73 Phil W1PJE _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Omni Vi+ 1.8 kHz filter response (2nd IF @ 6.3 MHz), Barry N1EU |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Filter Data, Ken Brown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni Vi+ 1.8 kHz filter response (2nd IF @ 6.3 MHz), Barry N1EU |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Omni Vi+ 1.8 kHz filter response (2nd IF @ 6.3 MHz), Peter Bertini |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |