Sorry guys and gals - this "reply to the reflector" bites me every time.
This was intended to be a private response, not a public one. Sigh . .
.
73, Duane
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:40:45 -0600 Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
writes:
> Tom,
> That's surely part of it. But the other part of it is the
> military and gov't radios they do on contract. If they were trying
> to
> stay in business just on their ham radio income, I think they would
> have
> folded a while back. Don't get me wrong - I love my TT radios, but
> they
> do need to improve their communications and attitudes in some areas.
>
>
> 73, Duane
>
>
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:24:39 -0500 "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
> writes:
> > Isn't it just amazing that TT has been able to stay in business
> for
> > the
> > past 35 years without an 'auto-responder'? Certainly couldn't have
>
> > anything
> > to do with them engineering darn good amateur radio equipment over
>
> > that
> > period of time!!
> >
> > Tom - W4BQF
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Martin Ewing" <martin@aa6e.net>
> > To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 12:51 PM
> > Subject: Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits auto-responder
> >
> >
> > > Second that!
> > >
> > > TT will only win if we have a two-way communication. An
> > auto-responder is
> > a
> > > first step, but live acknowledgement is even better. (I got a
> > note from
> > Gary
> > > about my recent bug report. Thanks.)
> > >
> > > Sometimes it must be hard to take time away from "business" to
> do
> > email
> > with
> > > end-users, but it will pay off.
> > >
> > > On the other hand, the user community has to be careful not to
> > overload TT
> > with
> > > flamewars, trivia, and cockpit problems.
> > >
> > > -73 = Martin, AA6E
> > > ---------------------
> > >
> > > Subject: [TenTec] ditsnbits auto-responder
> > > From: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
> > > Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:06:18 -0600
> > > To: tentec@contesting.com
> > >
> > > Would like to give congraduations to Gary and company.
> > >
> > > An e-mail to ditsnbits this morning was replied to with an auto
> > responder,
> > >
> > > Thanks Gary & Ten Tec for listeneing to this forum.
> > >
> > > 73's
> > > Rich
> > > K5SF
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TenTec mailing list
> > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> >
>
>
> Duane Calvin, AC5AA
> Austin, Texas
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
Duane Calvin, AC5AA
Austin, Texas
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|