Isn't it just amazing that TT has been able to stay in business for the
past 35 years without an 'auto-responder'? Certainly couldn't have anything
to do with them engineering darn good amateur radio equipment over that
period of time!!
Tom - W4BQF
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Ewing" <martin@aa6e.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits auto-responder
> Second that!
>
> TT will only win if we have a two-way communication. An auto-responder is
a
> first step, but live acknowledgement is even better. (I got a note from
Gary
> about my recent bug report. Thanks.)
>
> Sometimes it must be hard to take time away from "business" to do email
with
> end-users, but it will pay off.
>
> On the other hand, the user community has to be careful not to overload TT
with
> flamewars, trivia, and cockpit problems.
>
> -73 = Martin, AA6E
> ---------------------
>
> Subject: [TenTec] ditsnbits auto-responder
> From: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:06:18 -0600
> To: tentec@contesting.com
>
> Would like to give congraduations to Gary and company.
>
> An e-mail to ditsnbits this morning was replied to with an auto responder,
>
> Thanks Gary & Ten Tec for listeneing to this forum.
>
> 73's
> Rich
> K5SF
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|