TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Capture area (was 80 meter loops)

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Capture area (was 80 meter loops)
From: jsb@digistar.com
Reply-to: jsb@digistar.com, tentec@contesting.com
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:00:24 -0500 (EST)
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Sinisa Hristov wrote:

> If the wavelength is known, as it normally is, then effective area can
> be calculated from isotropic gain, and vice versa:
>
>   Ae = Gi * lambda ^ 2 / (4 * Pi)
>
>   Gi = 4 * Pi * Ae / (lambda ^ 2)
>
>
> The origin of this topic came from a false assumption that the "capture
> area" of a very long wire antenna is large simply because of the length
> of the wire, and regardless of the directivity.
>
> This was shown to be entirely wrong:  effective area and gain are
> proportional to each other. In directions of low gain the effective area
> is small regardless of the length of the wire, or countries worked :-)

Hmmm...

So is a halfwavelength dipole a preferable antenna than a endfed halfwave
for a given band?  How does an endfed fullwave or 3/2 wave antenna compare
to 1/2 wave endfed vs dipole?



73 Jason N1SU
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>