RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Q Rate Killers

To: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Q Rate Killers
From: Al Hanzl <alhanzl@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:26:16 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Well, my logic may be screwed up, but everything is relative. 
I run 100 watts with compromised antennas due to fact I live on a typical small 
suburban lot with one large tree smack in middle of a small backyard. 
I am sometimes asked for repeats. 

There may be QRPers with more ERP than I put out. 

And I do get annoyed when stations with booming signals can't hear me at all. 

As much as I sometimes get discouraged that the same super stations keeping 
winning, it's not their problem that I can't compete. 
I sometimes run QRP just so I have a chance to win a low participation sub 
category. 
Anyway, some rambling thoughts from an amateur contester. 
Al
K2AL 


Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 27, 2016, at 11:28 AM, Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com> wrote:
> 
> ------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)
> 
>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 08:38:30 -0400, Dave wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 3. Because of the higher possibility of repeat requests, does anyone 
>> think that qrp is out of place in some or all RTTY contests.
> 
> REPLY:
> 
> Maybe I'm just an old grump, but I think QRP is annoying anywhere in
> ham radio, not just contests. The QRPers are proud of their lousy
> signals whereas the REAL work is done by the stations trying to copy
> them. 
> 
> Flame deflector on, fire away. :-)
> 
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>