I agree with you 100%, Bill. My theory is "Life is too short for QRP." I have
my flameproof suit on. :)
Dick - W0RAA
>
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Q Rate Killers (Bill Turner)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:28:34 +0000
> From: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
> To: RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Q Rate Killers
> Message-ID:
>
> <CY1PR0301MB1196EDA0AC80266B08798143C0CC0@CY1PR0301MB1196.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> ------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)
>
>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 08:38:30 -0400, Dave wrote:
>>
>>
>> 3. Because of the higher possibility of repeat requests, does anyone
>> think that qrp is out of place in some or all RTTY contests.
>
> REPLY:
>
> Maybe I'm just an old grump, but I think QRP is annoying anywhere in
> ham radio, not just contests. The QRPers are proud of their lousy
> signals whereas the REAL work is done by the stations trying to copy
> them.
>
> Flame deflector on, fire away. :-)
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of RTTY Digest, Vol 165, Issue 35
> *************************************
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|