Ron,
>From what I know, there's no chance of it happening any time soon; none of the
>Yaesu radios that have System Fusion capabilities can use that mode with
>anything other than one specific accessory and if memory serves, the FT-991
>doesn't even support it, period.
Yeah, I guess you're right; it's too bad folks have to feel threatened by
things that won't happen to realize that maybe their version of events isn't
the whole story. Sadly, it's those folks that are the ones that make choices
that retard the advancement of technology in one country compared to the rest
of the world.
Matthew Pitts
N8OHU
On August 16, 2016 7:30:36 PM EDT, Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com> wrote:
>Matthew, it has a purely data mode that doesn't have a voice component
>and just because
>there's zero interest now doesn't mean some idiot won't decide to try
>it.
>
>I think we're pretty much done here, we'll never agree on much and
>there's way too many
>hams that have been beaten to death by Winlink in it's various modes
>over more than a few
>years. It could have been different but some on the wide band side
>preferred to be band bullies
>rather than work with others, that will never change. Look at the
>proposal, where it originated
>and the comments about P4, like I said it's all about email and Winlink
>
>wanting P4 nothing more.
>
>&3
>Ron
>K0IDT
>
>
>
>On 8/16/2016 4:18 PM, Matthew Pitts via RTTY wrote:
>> Ron,
>>
>> It's also classified as Phone under current rules, irrespective of
>what the emission designators say it is. Also, to the best of my
>knowledge (and I say this because I'm in quite a few System Fusion
>message groups) there is absolutely zero interest in operating it on
>HF; D-STAR does show up on the HF bands occasionally, but for a very
>short time and in the Phone portion of the bands.
>>
>> Matthew Pitts
>> N8OHU
>>
>> On August 16, 2016 5:00:04 PM EDT, Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
>wrote:
>>> Matthew, the reason you don't see wide band digi voice in the sub
>band
>>> is simple. In the case
>>> of System Fusion, 12.5kHz, the baud rate is 9600 and not legal under
>>> current rules but.....you
>>> knew that was coming, the emission designators are allowed under
>>> current
>>> rules, F1D F7W .
>>>
>>> I really don't know what the FCC or the ARRL had in mind when they
>went
>>>
>>> down this dirt road.
>>>
>>> Ron K0IDT
>>>
>>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|