RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Hints and tips on how to file comments on RM-11708

To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Hints and tips on how to file comments on RM-11708
From: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 20:20:36 -0800
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On Nov 24, 2013, at 7:46 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:

> > So, 500 Hz definitely does not mesh with the current rules.
> 
> 500 Hz does not mesh with the maximums *implied by* the current
> rules. However, *it does* confirm with the Commission's stated
> intent when they established the current rules and the explicit
> rule which applies to automatically controlled digital transmissions.

Joe, I still don't think that works.

The FCC has always allowed 850 Hz shift at 45.45 baud from the moment hams were 
first permitted to use FSK.  It was initially the *only* thing allowed, and it 
was later (February 1956) that they allowed 170 Hz shift.  It is a historical 
precedence.  And it has never been taken away.

So, I don't think it is correct to say that 500 Hz is their intent.  

73
Chen, W7AY


 


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>