Could be. I would suggest you downgrade to 4.31 firmware and see if the
problem still exists. 4.43k is whack.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 2003-Jul-09 at 10:29 AM Dan Metcalf wrote:
>If your limiting your interface to 128k it will drop packets and impact
>performance at when the link gets near 128k
>
>But they may NOT be your problem.. could be interference?
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
>[mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]
>> On Behalf Of Noyan Dede
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 3:26 AM
>> To: 'Karlnet Mailing List'
>> Subject: [Karlnet] Which F/W?
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> This is my first message to the list. We are a wireless equipment
>> provider
>> in Turkey. For one of our customers we've installed a base station
>and 5
>> satellites for internet service distribution. We are currently using
>4.43k
>> but I am getting frequent ping timeouts from the satellites. All of
>the
>> satellites are bandwidth limited on their wlan interface to 128k. In
>> addition , the ping times to the base station is also very irregular
>like:
>>
>> Reply from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=246
>> Reply from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=200ms TTL=246
>> Reply from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=201ms TTL=246
>> Reply from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=246
>> Reply from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=246
>> Reply from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=270ms TTL=246
>> Reply from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=246
>> Reply from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=246
>> Reply from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=246
>> Reply from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=246
>> Reply from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=246
>> Reply from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=246
>> Reply from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=246
>> Reply from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=246
>>
>> To the satellite it is even worse and my last statistics said there
>was
>> about 9% packet loss.
>>
>> My signal and noise levels are pretty stable and I really can 't
>figure
>> out
>> the reason for instability.
>>
>> We are using KN100 boards in outdoor enclosures with AC power supplies
>all
>> the way to the enclosure and a mini industrial PS to feed the boards
>with
>> clean 12 VDC on the adaptor connector.
>>
>> Can someone point us in the right direction as to where to look to
>solve
>> this problem?
>>
>> Also I'd like to know which mode is most popular in the WISP scenario
>at
>> the
>> base station (polling base station, non polling, ISP, ...)
>>
>> I, myself, am considering using a different firmware after seeing some
>of
>> the other problems people have been having with 4.43k but I don't know
>> which
>> f/w is deemed to be the most stable so far.
>>
>> I'd appreciate any pointers in the matter.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Noyan Dede
>> _______________________________________________
>> Karlnet mailing list
>> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
>> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>> --
>> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>
>--
>[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>_______________________________________________
>Karlnet mailing list
>Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
>http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|