and would those radios be PtP radios? b/c you'd only have one IP to spare
w/ a /30
-----Original Message-----
From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
Behalf Of Dan Metcalf
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 3:54 PM
To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput? - some routing examples
Oops, I should have put interface 2
But basically I was going to add DIRECT routes of /30 for EACH radio
Dan Metcalf
Wireless Broadband Sytems
dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com
www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]
On
> Behalf Of Charles Chia Sheng Wu
> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 4:57 PM
> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Drop in Throughput? - some routing examples
>
> >Originally I was thinking of this
>
> >10.10.10.1/30 - DIRECT - 1 (radio would have 10.10.10.2)
> >10.10.11.1/30 - DIRECT - 1 (radio would have 10.10.11.2)
>
> interface 1 is Ethernet
>
> -Charles
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|