Do you think those complaints come more often from those who do not ID
after every QSO?
Barry W2UP
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 5:34 PM Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com> wrote:
> Excellent point. I did notice a number of complaints from people that
> had been spotted wrong causing them a bunch of dupes because people
> don't always confirm who they are working. The ability to say hey W0MU
> is here not W0TU is valuable.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On 3/10/2024 2:57 PM, Jack Brindle wrote:
> > Mike;
> >
> > The skimmer code sometimes gets the call wrong. I saw quite a few
> skimmer/RBN spots in CW DX Test that were incorrect. Most had a skimmer
> spot at the same frequency with the correct call.
> > Just to make sure, it seems reasonable to do a self-spot to make sure it
> gets through properly. In phone test, I saw a lot of this.
> >
> > It might also be worth while to re-spot the bad call with something out
> of the CW segment to get it out of most user’s maps. It would be
> interesting to hear peoples thoughts on doing that, especially since it is
> somewhat possible the call is a good one.
> >
> > 73,
> > Jack, W6FB
> >
> >> On Mar 9, 2024, at 3:16 PM, Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> What would be the reason to self spot on CW? I see the advantages on
> SSB.
> >>
> >> W0MU
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/9/2024 9:36 AM, Sandy N7RQ via CQ-Contest wrote:
> >>> Interesting. I tried self-spotting for the first time. Although it
> appeared to work in tests prior to the contest, I couldn't get it to work
> during it. Clearly, something I didn't do in the set-up prevented it. Bob
> K8IA was in the other room watching a mirror of my screen and he would spot
> me now and then at his leisure while he was watching tv, along with other
> folks in the contest who also spotted me. I'm still never going to beat
> KU2M with his east coast killer station, but I enjoyed a more steady run of
> stations for a good part of the contest. We won't talk about most of
> Sunday - bleah. Thank you for this, Tim. It's very interesting.
> >>> 73/88 Sandy N7RQ
> >>> On Saturday, March 9, 2024 at 07:14:13 AM MST, Tim Shoppa <
> tshoppa@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> 342 stations self-spotted during ARRL DX SSB 2024 more than 10
> times, a
> >>> clear step up over self-spotting usage in the CW leg two weeks earlier.
> >>>
> >>> Self-spotting has been allowed by ARRL for all entrants in ARRL
> contests
> >>> for 15 months now. Note that most all other contest sponsors -
> especially
> >>> CQ/WWROF contests - still explicitly ban self-spotting.
> >>>
> >>> Several prominent US/VE stations used DX callsigns as the originator
> when
> >>> sending some or all of their self spots to the cluster, and
> visa-versa. For
> >>> example, 9A7P self-spotted using W3WM, and AA3B self spotted using
> DL/AA3B.
> >>> This is above and beyond several US hams in the Caribbean that logged
> into
> >>> the cluster using their home callsigns. This is important to work
> around
> >>> geographically restrictive filters many hams have set for the origin
> of the
> >>> cluster spots they see.
> >>>
> >>> The top ten self-spotters in ARRL DX SSB 2024 by my analysis are:
> >>>
> >>> #self-
> >>> spots call spotted using calls
> >>> ----- ----- -------------------
> >>> 589 9A1A 9A1A 9A5W
> >>> 542 CR6K CR6K CT1ILT
> >>> 529 ZF1A ZF1A ZF1BB
> >>> 483 W3LPL W3LPL
> >>> 394 K1TTT K1TTT KA1R
> >>> 386 PJ2T K8ND PJ2T W0CG
> >>> 384 N5DX N5DX
> >>> 379 9A7P 9A7P W3WM
> >>> 360 EI7M G4PCS
> >>> 358 ED7W EB7A ED7W
> >>>
> >>> You can find my full self-spotting analysis for ARRL DX SSB 2024 and
> the
> >>> raw Telnet data at https://radiosport.world/2024arrlssb.html
> >>>
> >>> Tim N3QE
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|