CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence

To: k9yc@arrl.net, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Loss of Confidence
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 08:59:53 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I agree about making a "NIL" on his contact.

This makes me wonder if the contest sponsor is actually checking the logs even with that relaxed way of thinking.

 Not logging him is a start, But at the same time you are also punishing yourself too.
You spent the time making the somewhat contact.

I wonder what the offending stations Cabrillo file looks like. if it has the signal report in it.

The only thing I can see doing is in the soapbox areas complain about people doing this, and maybe post recordings of the offense happening, and let the tradition of being self policing happen?

If it is a part of the exchange it MUST be included.

Joe WB9SBD

On 11/13/2023 11:47 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
On 11/13/2023 6:14 PM, Hans Brakob wrote:
Below is an exchange of emails with the contest manager who seems not
concerned about my inquiry.  His attitude seems to be "it happens all
the time so we let it slide".

So it's OK for stations to drop stuff like their call from the SS exchange, and the report from that RTTY contest, so that at the end of the contest they've made better rate and a higher score?

On SSB, I can tell them that it's part of the exchange, but not on CW. Maybe the solution is for those of us who care to simply not log the QSO!

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>