CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] QRZ Button

To: john@kk9a.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QRZ Button
From: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 17:50:23 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Certainly likely to be more correct than SCP and is a validator of
information that you get from not-on-the-air sources.


On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 5:48 PM <john@kk9a.com> wrote:

> Assuming that the data being looked up is the station's state, the QRZ FCC
> callsign database is not 100% correct. Contesters borrow callsigns, guest
> op
> or use stations that are not at their FCC mailing address. In fact in the
> US
> and territories, the FCC address may show a completely different DXCC
> country than where the station is. The only accurate information is what is
> sent during the QSO. It should be pretty easy to ask for a repeat if the
> info was not copied.
>
> John KK9A
>
>
> Richard NN3W wrote:
>
> I would coach it in these terms:  Check Partial, Super Check Partial, and
> Call History provide you a "guess" as to what the correct data is.  Its not
> a definitive answer and SCP can and sometimes is wrong.  But a callsign
> database is an outside source that is the definitive database on what is
> (or should be) correct.
>
> 73 Rich NN3W
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>