The primary concern originally raised was that the rules for selected State QSO
Parties are written to unfairly influence mobiles to not operate enough if at
all on the high bands.
One of the contests in the list of perpetrators was the Pa QSO Party.
I’m very curious as to exactly which “mobile influencing” rules in the event
make it suspect. Because I don’t see any.
73, Ron W3WN
> On Sep 19, 2022, at 2:13 PM, Charles Sanders <no5w.chuck@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I agree with the concern voiced by K9YC regarding QSO party rules that
> create the wrong incentives for in-state participants.
>
> That is the reason we (TxQP) monitor the percent of QSOs that are Texas-to-
> Texas each year when the final report is prepared.
>
> However, I'm afraid that the actual data indicates that K9YC is missing out
> on some Texas QSO party fun as the data from three recent TxQP events
> indicates that the Texas-Texas QSO percentage varies from about 7% to 18%.
> Hardly seems like a good reason to avoid the TxQP.
>
> 73/Chuck/NO5W
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|