CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Call Sign Weight

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Call Sign Weight
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:24:25 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 4/21/2021 6:22 AM, Joe wrote:
here are many online weight calculators for Callsigns.

As far as I know, they all only tell you more or less how long it will take to send a callsign.

There are also issues like copy-ability on both CW and SSB, as well as having a suffix in common or similar to with others of a similar prefix. For my call, those include K9CC and AB9YC.

Choice of phonetics also matter. In general, phonetics that include a "hard" consonant work better than those without. While my recorded messages are Yankee Charlie, both are often mis-copied, and I find that I must substitute Yokohama or Canada. When I stray from something on one of the various standard lists, I find that well-known place names with a hard consonant work best (the K in Yokohama and C in Canada). For our club's call, KU6W, United works better than Uniform, thanks to the hard T in united.

And, of course, a prefix that's unique among active contesters is a big plus in WPX.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>