To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RES: CQ WPX M/M Distributed Category Update |
From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
Date: | Sat, 3 Apr 2021 10:51:26 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 4/3/2021 5:54 AM, Michael Walker wrote: You never commented on what you would think of this if you were in your 20's? You continue to miss my point. Encouraging young operators is a good thing. But that has NOTHING to do with my comment that if people HAVE stations, the contesting community benefits from their using them rather than being part of an effort that contributes only one call to work. Further, ham radio is about RADIO, which includes building stations. This DM effort does NOTHING to promote that. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RES: CQ WPX M/M Distributed Category Update, Ken K6MR |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RES: CQ WPX M/M Distributed Category Update, Trent Sampson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RES: CQ WPX M/M Distributed Category Update, Michael Walker |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RES: CQ WPX M/M Distributed Category Update, Mike Smith VE9AA |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |