Poor analogy. Brady didn't get DQ'd. He keeps the win, and the Championship.
Dit dit,
De Hans, K0HB
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Joe <nss@mwt.net> wrote:
> Personally,
> My thought for a penalty was just similar to Brady the football player.
> He got the 4 game no play. I'm not advocating a can't play next year in
> the contest. BUT a probationary category.
> Where, you clearly broke rules in 2014. And were DQ'ed for 2014. And are
> put on "Probation"
> Probation allows you to still participate in the 2015 event, BUT un-able
> to win any awards or be included in the standings.
> Your entry is a sidebar "Probation ummm Class?" Used by the organizers
> as a checklog more or less.
> AND If the log is clean of anything that would cause another DQ, or even
> a warning, then your probation is over and are fully free to compete in
> 2016.
> But another violation be it DQ value or even "Warning" level, causes
> your probation to continue for another year. Learn how to Operate
> according to the laws, and your probation is removed. can't learn and
> well too bad.
> Joe WB9SBD
> Sig
> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> Idle Tyme
> Idle-Tyme.com
> http://www.idle-tyme.com
> On 5/15/2015 7:26 PM, David Siddall wrote:
>> To be clear on the rules, CQWW 2014 contests were NOT "WRTC2018 qualifying
>> events" so no penalty automatically applies to those disqualified for the
>> 2014 CQWW contests. CQWW 2015 & 2016 contests ARE "WRTC2018 qualifying
>> events". 73, Dave K3ZJ
>>
>>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The WRTC2018 qualification rules include this passage:
>>>>
>>>>> Any operator whose callsign is published as being disqualified from any
>>>>> WRTC2018 qualifying event forfeits the right to apply. If the entry is
>>>> in a
>>>>> multi-operator category, all listed operators forfeit the right to
>>>> apply.
>>>>
>>>> That, being excluded from this year's results, and being the public focus
>>>> of quite a bit of unwanted attention (now and in the future) are probably
>>>> sufficient penalties.
>>>>
>>>> I hate to see anyone dragged through the mud, but hopefully any distress
>>>> caused by the public attention and the WRTC impact will encourage everyone
>>>> to behave better in the future.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Michael Adams | N1EN | mda@n1en.org
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>
>>>> Ok,
>>>> A violator was found, and has been prosecuted by both the contest
>>>> sponsors, and in the eyes of the rest of the contesting world.
>>>> I may have missed this next part. But what is happening next? The station
>>>> was DQ'ed from this years contest.
>>>>
>>>> OK,
>>>>
>>>> Now what if any penalties are imposed and for how long for the future?
>>>>
>>>> Joe WB9SBD
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|