[CQ-Contest] Proponents of Backwardness

To:	"W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject:	[CQ-Contest] Proponents of Backwardness
From:	"Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:36:08 -0000
List-post:	<cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

To:

"W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>

Subject:

[CQ-Contest] Proponents of Backwardness

From:

"Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>

Date:

Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:36:08 -0000

List-post:

<cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

Good afternoon, Mike.

It's always great to hear the well reasoned opinions of some of the greatcompetitors in our sport.


Your opinion is one that I always consider thoughtfully.

But not so much this time.

Characterizing those contesters who prefer to contest without spottingassistance as "proponents of backwardness" is just bad manners and seemsonly calculated to create divisiveness, not to present a cogent argument.


73, de Hans, K0HB

PS:  My Model T has a turbo-charged 6.6-liter 32-valve V8 under the hood.

-----Original Message-----From: W0MU Mike Fatchett



I have to wonder if the proponents for backwardness also drive Model A
and Model T cars, use wood stoves and have no indoor plumbing.

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com

http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, (continued) Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, W0MU Mike Fatchett Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, Radio K0HB Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, John Geiger Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, Pete Smith N4ZR Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, John Geiger Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, Joe Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, W0MU Mike Fatchett Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, John Geiger Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, Mark Beckwith Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, Dale Putnam [CQ-Contest] Proponents of Backwardness, Radio K0HB <= Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, W0MU Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Reminder, Edward Sawyer Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Reminder, Pete Smith N4ZR

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:	Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, John Geiger
Next by Date:	Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, W0MU
Previous by Thread:	Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, Dale Putnam
Next by Thread:	Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, W0MU
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Previous by Date:

Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, John Geiger

Next by Date:

Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, W0MU

Previous by Thread:

Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, Dale Putnam

Next by Thread:

Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, W0MU

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]