CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Reminder

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Reminder
From: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:33:21 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Ed, this is the reason why I'm urging people not to be put off. We can get it changed for next year, but only if we demonstrate that there is a lot of interest.

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.

On 10/22/2013 11:39 AM, Edward Sawyer wrote:
I would dispute that.  Yes, there was much discussion about a non-ironman
category like 24 hours.  How that turned into no DX spotting and only 1
radio is not clear.  There was not much call for that combination as I
recall the chatter.  I always wondered what the motivation was for that
actual end decision.  And it could greatly affect the participation since
many people who want to limit their hours also want those hours to be the
most efficient for their club and DX collection.  I could see many opting
out just because of that provision.

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>