I completed the survey and was surprised to see this proposed change in the
rules. The rules change proposed sounds like some of the guys who go to
the Carib are unhappy with a bottomless pit of 2 pointers.
Interesting it is only zones 6,7,8. What about the guys in KL7 who are
further away from the action than a guy in C6 or CO. Sound fair?
I suggest they check out some three point locations instead of looking for
a rules change.
K4XS
In a message dated 3/9/2013 4:17:38 P.M. Coordinated Universal Time,
W5OV@W5OV.COM writes:
The survey is to collect opinions on this and other questions.
Complete the survey and make your opinion count!
73,
W5OV
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Kim
Östman
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 2:34 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW?
Hi,
I just took the CQWW survey, and one question in particular sparked a
further question:
What is the origin and rationale for the CQWW rule where North American
stations get 2 points for intra-continent QSOs instead of just 1 point,
which is the case for all other continents?
I honestly don't know the answer, and find this exception to be very
strange. To see the idea about raising it to 3 points I find even stranger.
73
Kim OH6KZP
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|