To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW? |
From: | David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com> |
Date: | Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:05:31 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
That's a petulant thing to say. How are the organizers supposed to know that you are even still alive if you don't enter a log? They certainly aren't going to bother to look up the email address of everyone whose callsign shows up in the other logs that do get submitted. As far as anyone knows you're a spectator, not a participant. Dave AB7E On 3/9/2013 5:09 PM, Ron Notarius W3WN wrote: I see. Thanks Barry. There are those of use who operate in the contest, but do not submit logs for any of a variety of reasons. I guess our opinions aren't important then. Pity. This used to be one of my favorite contests, too. 73-----Original Message-----From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Barry Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 6:27 PM To: cq-contest@contesting.com Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW? My invitation said it was sent to those who submitted a log. If you submitted a log and didn't get one, you're not paranoid; they really are out to get you :-) Barry W2UP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW?, Ron Notarius W3WN |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW?, David Gilbert |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW?, Ron Notarius W3WN |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Over 60 emails in less than 24 hours, N6hc |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |