DARC ruined WAE?
How's so?
WAE seems to be the contest where the most skilled ops are present. And
contest mechanics represent a challenge that goes beyond logging pre-known
exchanges.
I really believe DARC deserves an apology from you, or at least an
explanation on how you think they ruined the contest.
Martin, LU5DX
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Dave Lawley <dave@g4buo.com> wrote:
>
> Really sorry to see you say this Randy. There are plenty of us who don't
> operate using the crutch of cluster.
>
> DARC ruined WAE by not making a distinction between unassisted and
> assisted and now I don't enter it any more. I'd really hate to see you make
> the same mistake with CQWW.
>
> 73, Dave G4BUO
>
>
> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 01:11:45 -0000
>> From: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
>> To: "'Pete Smith N4ZR'" <n4zr@contesting.com>,
>> <cq-contest@contesting.com>
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted
>>
>> For these contests where there is no assisted category, instead of making
>> yet another category, why not just allow single ops to use assistance?!
>>
>> Anyone licensed in the last 15 years has never experienced life without
>> the
>> DX Cluster. Perhaps it is time to accept this as it is - the new normal.
>>
>> Randy, K5ZD
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/cq-contest<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|