CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted
From: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:17:12 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
How about "We've done it that way from the days of sp*rk gap. So, if it's good enough for the sp*rkies, its good enough for us. ? :)

BTW, how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?

72/73 de n8xx Hg
QRP > 99.44% of the time

On 1/25/2013 12:00 PM, cq-contest-request@contesting.com wrote:
------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:31:42 -0500
From: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted

<snip>
To my knowledge, nobody has advanced a reason for keeping the status quo.
<snip>


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>