To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted |
From: | Dave Lawley <dave@g4buo.com> |
Date: | Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:06:37 +0000 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Really sorry to see you say this Randy. There are plenty of us who don't operate using the crutch of cluster. DARC ruined WAE by not making a distinction between unassisted and assisted and now I don't enter it any more. I'd really hate to see you make the same mistake with CQWW. 73, Dave G4BUO Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 01:11:45 -0000 From: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net> To: "'Pete Smith N4ZR'" <n4zr@contesting.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted For these contests where there is no assisted category, instead of making yet another category, why not just allow single ops to use assistance?! Anyone licensed in the last 15 years has never experienced life without the DX Cluster. Perhaps it is time to accept this as it is - the new normal. Randy, K5ZD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted, Paul O'Kane |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted, Martin , LU5DX |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted, mike |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted, Jim Rhodes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |