CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation
From: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Reply-to: n4zr@contesting.com
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:12:22 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Except, of course in the IARU.

73, Pete N4ZR

The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at 
reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000



On 2/28/2011 3:35 PM, kzerohb@gmail.com wrote:
> I believe (as in "it is my opinion") that the 500m rule is to disallow
> multiple receive/transmit sites all under a single call sign, a "distributed
> multi-multi" so to speak.
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB/K7
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul O'Kane
>
>> If, nevertheless, contest organisers are happy to accept
>> remote control entries, I'd suggest there is no point in
>> having a 500m rule in the first place.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>