| To: | "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation |
| From: | <kzerohb@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:47:34 -0700 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Paul wrote: > Of course, remote control gives an advantage. > If it didn't, no one would consider using it. If two equivalently equipped stations exist "side-by-side" (just far enough apart to avoid mutual interference), one controlled remotely and the other conventionally controlled, explain the competitive advantage enjoyed by the remotely controlled station. 73, de Hans, K0HB/K7 "Just a boy and his radio" _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation, Paul O'Kane |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 40M and 75M DX frequencies in ARRL DX SSB, Bill and Cindy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation, Mike Fatchett W0MU |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation, kzerohb |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |