Because Central America is part of North America!
73s John AA5JG
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>wrote:
> If they're in Central America, why would we add them as multipliers to a
> North America contest?
>
> Or are we worried about Entity Discrimination here?
>
>
> Jan 12, 2011 11:22:58 AM, aa5jg@fidmail.com wrote:
>
> Why stop with Mexico? What about the states of the different central
> American countries? Are they any less deserving to count than Mexico?
>
> 73s John AA5JG
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve London"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 2:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestion for NAQP
>
>
> > On 01/12/2011 07:05 AM, K1TTT wrote:
> >> But, but, but, that would change the whole nature of the contest. that
> >> would
> >> cause all the old records to be obsolete. that would change strategies.
> >> That might force some people to turn their antennas a bit. That might
> >> change the perennial winners a bit. that might make it more interesting.
> >
> > Perennial winners ?
> >
> > Look at the top-5 in the August CW NAQP, that was just published in the
> > January/February NCJ. Compare that to the high-claimed scores in last
> > weekends'
> > NAQP. A very different list ! This is what makes the NAQP a great
> contest.
> >
> > 73,
> > Steve, N2IC
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|