CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestion for NAQP

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestion for NAQP
From: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:01:30 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
While we're at it, I think we should make zip code 55075 a multiplier.

73 Steve K0SR
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Smith [mailto:dougw9wi@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 11:54 AM
To: k3fiv@arrl.net
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestion for NAQP

>> Jan 12, 2011 11:22:58 AM, aa5jg@fidmail.com wrote: >> >> Why stop with 
>> Mexico? What about the states of the different central >> American 
>> countries? Are they any less deserving to count than Mexico? At least 
>> literally, there are no states in the other Central American countries. 
>> (they call their sub-national subdivisions something else) -- Doug Smith 
>> W9WI Pleasant View, TN EM66 _______________________________________________ 
>> CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com 
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>