If they're in Central America, why would we add them as multipliers to a North
America contest?
Or are we worried about Entity Discrimination here?
Jan 12, 2011 11:22:58 AM, aa5jg@fidmail.com wrote:
Why stop with Mexico? What about the states of the different central
American countries? Are they any less deserving to count than Mexico?
73s John AA5JG
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve London"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestion for NAQP
> On 01/12/2011 07:05 AM, K1TTT wrote:
>> But, but, but, that would change the whole nature of the contest. that
>> would
>> cause all the old records to be obsolete. that would change strategies.
>> That might force some people to turn their antennas a bit. That might
>> change the perennial winners a bit. that might make it more interesting.
>
> Perennial winners ?
>
> Look at the top-5 in the August CW NAQP, that was just published in the
> January/February NCJ. Compare that to the high-claimed scores in last
> weekends'
> NAQP. A very different list ! This is what makes the NAQP a great contest.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|